Radiometric dating detector
– or if there is extra hydrostatic pressure slowing things down?
However, this isn’t the only problem with lava’s hardening under water.
Also, even if the actual ticking of the clock is reliable, one has to know if any outside influence has been able to move the hands of the clock beyond what the mechanism of the clock itself can achieve.Or, to put it negatively, the apologetic arguments which suppose the “days” of creation to be long eras of time, the figures of years not to be chronological, and the flood to be a merely local Mesopotamian flood, are not taken seriously by any such professors, as far as I know. – or the “Word of God” in the form of the claims of the human writers of the Bible? For me, I ask myself, “Where is the weight of evidence” that I can actually understand for myself?Now, I can only speak for myself here, but for me the weight of evidence and credibility remains firmly on the side of the Bible.Well, for many former and even current Christians, radiometric dating of the rocks of the Earth presents a serious problem when compared to the apparent claims of the Bible regarding a literal 7-day creation week – and many have voiced such concerns over the years (Link).After all, according to nearly all of the best and brightest scientists on the planet today, life has existed and evolved over many hundreds of of years. Their confidence is primarily based on the fact that radioactive elements decay or change into other elements at a constant and predictable clock-like rate.
Search for radiometric dating detector:
One of the many reasons that I’ve come to this conclusion is that I’ve studied the claims of many Biblical critics for most of my adult life, to include the very popular claims of the modern neo-Darwinian scientists, and I’ve found them to be either very weak or downright untenable – and this includes the popular claims regarding radiometric dating methods in general, which will be the focus of this particular discussion.