What the bible says about dating and relationships Free adult femdom chat
Call this the positive corollary to the sexual sin principle.
Scripture treats marriage as a unique and exclusive relationship, not just in its status, but in the means of relating within that status.
As already discussed, Song of Songs seems to be one long illustration of that idea.
Ephesians -33 also holds marriage out as unique in its level of commitment, relational bond, intimacy and as an illustration of the Gospel.
If you read Scripture and are unsure about a particular passage’s genre or context or application to a certain topic, a good study Bible can be helpful (the is the best I’ve ever seen). So, keeping things like genre and context in mind, what are some of the broad biblical principles that can guide us in the more specific question of how to date in a way that glorifies God? As you’ll see, they tend to build on and reinforce one another.
First Timothy 5 instructs us to treat older men “as you would a father, younger men as brothers, older women as mothers, younger women as sisters, in all purity” (1 Timothy 5:1-2).So to take one of my examples above, the story of Jacob and Rachel is found in Genesis, a historical narrative.The author’s main point in that part of Genesis is to describe the story of Jacob and Rachel as part of a larger narrative about God and His plan of redemption, not to “prescribe” (to endorse or instruct) anything about their conduct. It means that even though Jacob ended up taking two wives, that fact in a historical narrative does not override Paul’s direct teaching on marriage in Ephesians, 1 Corinthians and elsewhere that marriage is to be between one man and one woman.The Biblical Dating series takes a shot at that question in detail, as does the column “Principles for Drawing Boundaries.” The Bible talks about sexual sin as extremely serious, both as a sin against God and against the one with whom we sin.Again, Romans 13 talks about doing no wrong to our neighbors and then names sexual sin as just such a wrong.